Monthly estimate = 1BR rent + electricity + gas
A one-person monthly baseline (1BR rent plus typical utilities) runs $1,340 in Bakersfield, CA versus $1,100 in Missoula, MT. Overall, Missoula, MT is roughly 18% cheaper to live in day-to-day than Bakersfield, CA, driven mainly by electricity costs.
Median household income is $77,397 in Bakersfield, CA and $65,329 in Missoula, MT — about 16% higher in Bakersfield, CA. California has a top state income tax rate of 13.30% and a 7.25% state sales tax; Montana has a top state income tax rate of 5.65% and no state sales tax.
Rent
Buying a Home
Income
People & Lifestyle
Crime (per 100k/yr)
FBI Crime Data Explorer. Offenses per 100,000 residents per year; agency reporting practices vary, so this is approximate.
Climate
Gas
Area: California vs Rocky Mountain (PADD 4).
Public Transit
Adult base one-way fare — GET Bus vs — (2026).
Utilities
Residential, state-level averages (EIA). MCF = 1,000 cubic feet.
Groceries
Average prices — West vs West (BLS). Regional where available, otherwise U.S. average.
State Taxes
Bakersfield vs Missoula — FAQ
- Is it cheaper to live in Bakersfield or Missoula?
- Missoula, MT is cheaper. Its monthly baseline of $1,100 (1BR rent + utilities) runs about 18% below Bakersfield, CA's $1,340, mainly because of electricity costs.
- How much more do you need to earn to live in Bakersfield than in Missoula?
- To keep rent near the recommended 30% of gross income, you'd want to earn roughly $40,000 a year in Bakersfield versus $38,000 in Missoula.
- Which has lower taxes, Bakersfield or Missoula?
- Bakersfield is taxed under California's rules (a top state income tax rate of 13.30% and a 7.25% state sales tax); Missoula under Montana's (a top state income tax rate of 5.65% and no state sales tax).
Sources: US Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year (rent, income, home value, demographics); NOAA Climate Normals 1981–2010 (climate); EIA weekly retail (gas); Tax Foundation 2026 (state taxes).