Monthly estimate = 1BR rent + electricity + gas
A one-person monthly baseline (1BR rent plus typical utilities) runs $1,300 in Aurora, CO versus $1,330 in Bakersfield, CA. Overall, Aurora, CO is roughly 2% cheaper to live in day-to-day than Bakersfield, CA, driven mainly by electricity costs.
Median household income is $85,364 in Aurora, CO and $77,397 in Bakersfield, CA — about 9% higher in Aurora, CO. Colorado has a top state income tax rate of 4.40% and a 2.9% state sales tax; California has a top state income tax rate of 13.30% and a 7.25% state sales tax.
Rent
Buying a Home
Income
People & Lifestyle
Crime (per 100k/yr)
FBI Crime Data Explorer. Offenses per 100,000 residents per year; agency reporting practices vary, so this is approximate.
Climate
Gas
Area: Colorado vs California.
Public Transit
Adult base one-way fare — RTD vs GET Bus (2026).
Utilities
Residential, state-level averages (EIA). MCF = 1,000 cubic feet.
Groceries
Average prices — West vs West (BLS). Regional where available, otherwise U.S. average.
State Taxes
Aurora vs Bakersfield — FAQ
- Is it cheaper to live in Aurora or Bakersfield?
- Aurora, CO is cheaper. Its monthly baseline of $1,300 (1BR rent + utilities) runs about 2% below Bakersfield, CA's $1,330, mainly because of electricity costs.
- How much more do you need to earn to live in Aurora than in Bakersfield?
- To keep rent near the recommended 30% of gross income, you'd want to earn roughly $46,000 a year in Aurora versus $40,000 in Bakersfield.
- Which has lower taxes, Aurora or Bakersfield?
- Aurora is taxed under Colorado's rules (a top state income tax rate of 4.40% and a 2.9% state sales tax); Bakersfield under California's (a top state income tax rate of 13.30% and a 7.25% state sales tax).
Sources: US Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year (rent, income, home value, demographics); NOAA Climate Normals 1981–2010 (climate); EIA weekly retail (gas); Tax Foundation 2026 (state taxes).